Thursday, August 8, 2013

The Truth About Expensive Rehabs (As I See It...) Addiction is a BIG Business



- Rehabs and Sober Livings are a BUSINESS... And what businesses want are REPEAT CUSTOMERS!

Being an active member of a 12-step program, I see rehab survivors and sober-living residents nearly daily. Most of the people who have come into the program in the last 20-25 years have come from one of these facilities.

However, most of those have come from several of these facilities. . .

Sobriety is the product they are selling, or so they say. Actually, it is relief... from the stress of addiction. And because it is such a toxic cesspool of unnecessary and destructive drama, the public face of being in the treatment business is benevolent. "Angels" among us, really. But are they? Or is that just another myth of the business of treatment?

My anecdotal information is probably similar to the stories you would hear in any big city, from Atlanta, Miami, New York, San Francisco, etc. And the facilities exist in abundance... Especially in Los Angeles and Phoenix, two areas where they sprang up before the onset of regulations and oversight and where the models were often created. Existing locations were grandfathered in with the regulations reflecting what already existed with some modification. In towns like this, the rehab business is contributing heavily to the bottom line, meaning government takes a partnership role, rather than a supervisory role...

So an article that appeared in the Hollywood Reporter 8/8/2013 that pretends to be aghast at the deaths of two people because of alleged lack of oversight and prevention seems so "Unh?" at best.

(Look here for a photo album of celebrities in rehab)

When I got sober in 1978, there were very few facilities that would treat addiction and dependency. The term "dual-diagnosis" was not invented yet. Insurance would not cover addiction - only mental illness; and in those days, it DID cover mental illness! People with addiction problems went to mental institutions and the few places pre-Betty Ford that covered this kind of thing.

I know that - because at the age of 18 I was sent to Del Amo Hospital where I spent a year incarcerated with bonafide lunatics for  my addiction to cocaine. Too bad for me, cocaine was not considered addicting in those days; they just said I was nuts and treated me that way. I was on a locked unit for 10.5 months...

That was the best they could do for me, and fortunately, I was exposed to a 12-step group whose members brought meetings and literature into the hospital. Like so many others, I was loaded within 6 months of leaving the facility. However, it was one of the two psychiatrists I was seeing who recommended that a glass of wine might be helpful for a social lubricant, exhibiting the enormous divide between psychiatric professionals and the addiction problem. For if one drink was too many, a thousand was not enough; I was off and running. It took a few years and several dangerous events but I remembered what I had seen and I returned to the (free) 12-step program when my bottom proved to have a trap door. I have spent my life in it.

As I said, addiction is big business and like any big business, it depends upon repeat business. How better to get that than to provide a cushy environment replete with treats on call, like horse back riding or tennis therapy, massage and meditation, nature hikes and beach volleyball? These rehabs often appear more like Adult Summer Camps than therapeutic environments! Who wouldn't want to check out of life when the heat is on - check into a rehab - and use the excuse, "I'm working on myself" for every perk the place has to offer? Wouldn't that predispose you to do it all over again the next time you got into trouble? Wouldn't anyone want to be a stoner just to get that all over again?

This also speaks to the issue of what to do for the alcoholic or addict who has money. Take the money? Let them keep buying time in 30-day increments? How can a person who can buy his way out ever hope to get sober? That is another dilemma for another blog.

For the record, I did not ride horses or play tennis at Del Amo. I did, however, check out of life, dump my responsibilities and get to spend a year focused on me, my favorite subject. With three squares and a cot, I was pretty comfortable, thanks to daddy's insurance. I got used to the locked doors and the crazies. I learned to deal with institutional living. But I digress.

But the sober living and rehab "fix" is an insidious compromise of good intentions, alchemy and human failings. And apropos of that I don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater - there are some really good people and places where sobriety does comes first, with compassion and kindness and a healing environment that inspires sobriety. You just have to find them.

Promises, the world-famous hi-end treatment facility in Malibu, has garnered its reputation by being one of the first to promise (no pun intended) luxury facilities - a promise truly delivered. Some other such facilities run by the group are downscale but by no means low-end. Catering to the rich and famous is their business, and in some ways, puts them at risk because of the tendency of the rich to "relapse."(see above, "how does a rich person get sober?") Relapse prevention is a voluntary, post-stay option. For many it is simply not an option, especially if attaining long-term sobriety is not a goal.

There are so many rehabs and sober living homes in West Los Angeles that it is hard to keep up with them. Its so incredibly lucrative! Once a home is leased, certified and active, business is good. In some homes, there are regular pee tests and breathalyzers, depending on the case and payee, but most are relatively unregulated, despite what you think. There are no shortage of drunks and drug addicts. Today's young addicts have a new/old craze - they have resurrected shooting heroin! That and speed. Nice. Bring back the DARE program and Just Say No!

Sober living is post-rehab, and rehab is post-detox. So there are levels of treatment. In the article in the Hollywood Reporter, this hierarchy is referenced. Detox is the first stage when a client begins to dry out from whatever it is that he or she is on. In some cases it is relatively low-key. But when the drugs include alcohol meth, heroin, prescription pain meds and tranqs, cocaine or crack and some other key drugs, detox can be gnarly and absolutely life threatening and would best be handled with medical supervision.

That being said, it is also true that in many cases in my early days in sobriety there were no doctors present when people went through withdrawal. All we had was the ER or an ambulance if things turned bad, but we muddled through it. A drunk would call Central Office downtown and a member would answer. We would get calls anytime of the day or night. It was customary to grab another member and drive out wherever it was and talk to the person about sobriety. We would sit until we could get someone else to come. We called it a 12-step call. They don't do that anymore. We don't need to take that risk today. It is stupid, especially if the client has health insurance that covers it!

Here is the scenario:

Parents come to the rehab with a nineteen year old kid; or a husband comes with his wife of two decades and the mother of his children, or the employer comes with a valuable employee upon whom he depends (think: major star in an upcoming production) and upon whose shoulders rest the livelihood of many people.

Rehab says, "No worries. We will take care of this. We have a great success rate. We know your pain. We deal with this all the time. We will treat your person with total discretion and hands-on individualized care."

In some cases, say the teenager - they even throw in, "No amount of money will ever replace your son's life."So they mortgage the house. Really.

More and more, large corporations are taking over these facilities with the full understanding that they are business. They are run with a strict profit motive and a business model to pay dividends to their investors, often doctors and people who lend their names and reputations to provide leverage in the game of recommendations.

Recommendations are everything in this business when a vulnerable family with a crisis individual presents itself. Time is crucial - the person is in a one-week detox and afterward, released to the same situation that got them there in the first place. Best to place them in treatment directly from detox. They rush to a solution in the throws of the drama, hoping that their medical professionals will be able to steer them to the right facility for their loved one. It is a devastatingly vulnerable moment. It is about available beds, cost, insurance coverage or price, performance history, desperation, love and hope.

Rehabs themselves are so fallible! They are run by humans. But Sober Living is most vulnerable to human errors.

Rehabs are subject to much oversight. The best of them, such as Betty Ford and Hazeldon, are run by highly competent individuals who are versed in decades of experience in treatment. But cost does not make it better or worse, as many of the lower end treatment facilities are extremely experienced in the business of rehab - but on a scrappier level. Their clients get deloused when they arrive. It is not a resting place for the super-entitled unless - they are court-ordered.

Robert Downey, Jr. is my hero. A died-in-the-wool addict/alcoholic, his addiction took him to prison, nearly got him banned from Hollywood, drove him to the depths of insanity and desperation and eventually ended up in the the most arduous of low-end facilities, the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility State Prison. He got it. He got sober. But he still had a long, hard climb back up. His success is based on being the person who was always in there under a haze of substances - and the good fortune of having people who believed in him put it on the line for him so he could start over.

More about this human factor in rehabs:

I cannot name names or quote specific people without giving up their anonymity, a critical piece in the puzzle of sobriety, but there are many instances of inappropriate behavior in rehab staff and management.

Part of the problem (or not) is that often, stripped of their former profession, many emerge from treatment gung-ho for bear. On fire about the joys of sobriety and bridges to their old lives burned,  they are infected with the need to spread the word. It is the most natural thing in the world to want to invest in what has saved your life. They get credentials or just get jobs in the industry (and sobriety IS an industry!) And if they have the means, they begin their own sober living facility.

However, being members of the sober community we all suffer some basic, common personality quirks. For example, we are selfish and self-seeking; we minimize and deny our faults; we self-aggrandize; we are self-righteous. Given the power of being the head of a sober living where one is treated to courts' deference and recommended by health professionals to manage people's lives- can be a heady atmosphere.

Once in the throws of believing one's own PR, it is only a matter of time before the bottom will drop out. If we forget that we are all alcoholics among alcoholics, addicts among addicts and that the same rules still apply - we lose perspective. Unfortunately it can also mean loss of sobriety or even another bad behavior cropping up in place of drugs and alcohol - ie., sex addiction, spending, gambling - the list goes on.

(Here I would like to define addiction as this: "A behavior or substance that temporarily relieves anxiety so that when it wears off, the addict will do anything to get again.")

Too often, falling off the wagon for these people threatens to be a public experience and a black eye on sober programs, the profession and the person. Finger-pointing and blame do nothing to relieve the public perception of failure. It is bad for the whole community of rehabs and 12-step programs.






Thursday, August 1, 2013

The President's New Gun Laws - The Devil in the Details


The World was shocked by the violence at Sandy Hook. Every parent cried for those parents. Every one of us hugged our children and thanked God for their lives. Every one of us grieved. 

But once again, we, as a nation, willingly give up our freedoms to be part of a nanny state that believes that the government has our best interest at heart. Do we really believe that? Look at their track record!

Perhaps the best legislation would be to make any crime committed with a gun a federal crime. period. Put them in a federal penitentiary if there is a gun. That is a deterrent.

Once more I am aghast at the little bitty details: like Number 2 on this list - another infringement on our privacy, another one of those bits of legislation that over-reaches into the MEDICINE - and makes DOCTORS into LAW ENFORCEMENT officials! Really? why? How does that help my MEDICAL CARE???

Number 3 - "IMPROVE INCENTIVES" is what happens with schools. We will give you federal dollars if you do xxx. And then what happens? Schools, nationwide, stink. No one gets educated. Many federal dollars since the Carter Administration made the Federal Department of Education - and nothing has improved. It has become a behemoth for spending and regulation, a vehicle to empower the teachers unions, and a tool for propaganda for the Democratic party.

How about this one:  "Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign."
The NRA has been doing that for decades, right? Now it will be administered by the Federal Government, a whole new bureaucracy, a federally legislated and controlled gun-ownership bureaucracy that will take notes, track you down, put chips in you, mark you - because they don't want any stupid upstart citizens with guns to get out of hand. Only criminals can do that! 

Another good one: 
"14. Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence." WTF? Is using a gun a disease? Is it a disease when a subsistance hunter goes out to shoot the elk and deer he puts in his freezer to feed his family through the winter? Oh. I forgot. You live in New York DC LA... You wouldn't know about those guys, nor would you care. 

WHAT THE HELL? THE CDC CAN'T HANDLE THE FLU! Now they are an arm of the ATF? Really?

And this:

20. Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.

21. Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges.

22. Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations. 

OBAMACARE has made a joke of any mental health system that was left. Take a pill. That is the prescription. Pills did not help the Sandy Hook people. His mom was trying to commit him; she was hindered by the state with laws that prevented her from being able to slap a conservatorship on a kid she knew was out of control. She had to go through government channels. And the state legislature struck down laws that would have made it easier for her to do that one month before the massacre. 

Sometimes, people with mental health issues are a danger to themselves and others. Period. Compassion for the patient has to be weighted against the safety of the public and the harm S/he can do to him/herself. 

The following is a list, provided by the White House, of executive actions President Obama plans to take to address gun violence.


1. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.

3. Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system.

4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.

5. Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun.

6. Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.

7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.

8. Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

9. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

10. Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement.

11. Nominate an ATF director.

12. Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.

13. Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime.

14. Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.

15. Direct the Attorney General to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies.

16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.

17. Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities.

18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.

19. Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education.

20. Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover.

21. Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges.

22. Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations.

23. Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

WTF? Who is Jill Kelley and Why Did This Happen?

WHO DO THEY THINK THEY ARE?


Here we have it, the true seedy side of perverted privilege, a side affect of being the Beautiful People, where the rules don't apply to you. Or do they?

Up until a week ago, General George Patraeus was an exalted bureaucrat and a puppet of the Obama administration, heading the CIA. As a general he served with distinction and achieved the highest honors. And as a politician, as all generals are, his ambitions had taken him to the head of the nation's most important clandestine service.

But who is Jill Kelley? and -

Who is Paula Broadwell?


They are that kind of women: beautiful, sexy and ambitious. . . And they knew how to use their assets to ensnare the most powerful men they could find and leverage their relationships.

Paula Broadwell had no prior experience writing biographies. And Kelley had no business having breakfast at the White House, being "Honorary Consulate General to South Korea" and brokering deals for coal in Korea!

And what is the link to Benghazi?  Charles Krauthammer says the link is that Patraeus thought that if he towed the White House line on the video being the cause of the spontaneous riot that killed Ambassador Stevens and three others - he could keep his job?

And what of the President's defense of Rice? In yesterday's rather unsatisfying and brief press conference, the president was furious at the notion that Rice knowingly lied to the public when she went on FIVE different Sunday news shows to tell this fiction. While spitting in anger, he stumbled over his response and stated plainly that HE was the guy who told her to go out there and tell lies.

Whatever the case, as the days go by it gets worse.

Today's headlines reflect the true unemployment figures, revised upwards, including especially Ohio and New Jersey.

What else has been hidden until after the election? Geesh... What a seedy mess! This is disgusting!

For those of you who voted for this guy, I commend you. You will get what you wanted. We will all pay higher taxes, struggle for jobs, succumb to obamacare, be subjected to the realities of a smaller, stupider military (and maybe even a John Kerry Secretary of Defense!), a shrinking economy, burgeoning deficits and who knows? The affects will continue long after we are all dead and gone.

But we live in a world where entitlement is the rule, rather than the exception. A whole generation of Americans is graduating from  high school, college and graduate school anticipating welfare and unemployment, without shame. This generation feels entitled to receive such "benefits," despite the fact that people like you and me are paying for it. And our ranks are shrinking. In addition, we have a whole nation of state, federal and local employees who are overpaid and pensioned; union workers; and teachers unions that we, the taxpayers are indebted to - for pensions and health care that we didn't bargain for. The politicians did it and that is how they keep getting elected. 

A nation that is dependent on the government for all their basic needs, from medical care to food stamps - is a nation that is doomed. It is entirely unsustainable. But with such a deficit, and so few of us footing the bill anymore, it will have to fail before we see what we gave up.


Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Townhall Debate Results

I'm not a pundit, and I have not listened to the post-debate news, but I have an opinion.
I sat in a mixed public audience at the Hammer Museum in West Los Angeles. I heard the mostly liberal audience applaud politely when they thought Obama scored and one woman, with a big mouth, who vocally chastised Romney whenever she felt he was wrong.
Otherwise, it was myself and my two friends, being extra-polite and keeping our mouths shut.
And I saw the CNN audience reaction graph. (see Luntz Focus Group results here)

So, here is what I saw:

Obama and Romney ran a close tie. Again, like the election, this is a close race.

A tie favors Obama. All he had to do was better his last performance.



BOTH candidates looked presidential.

When they got into it, I watched the CNN audience response slide into the negatives. Bantering is a negative. Politeness is a positive. So when anyone held back from comments, they won points with that undecided audience, especially among those women, who are the main target audience.

Obama did not hold back. He attacked Romney with claims that Romney was telling falsehoods. Each time he did, which was EVERY time he spoke, he went into the negative territory with women.

Obama and Romney had one job last night. It was simple. Convince undecided voters to cast their vote for that candidate. Obama failed. He once again, spoke ONLY to his base.

LIBYA

That, in a nutshell, will be the takeaway from this debate. The rest is blah, blah, blah.

Crowley handed it to Obama. "Didn't Secretary Clinton take full responsibility for that?" The moderator fed the president an "out" from the seriousness of this situation.

The President stood up with self-righteous anger, claiming that he was "friends" with the whole diplomatic corps. Sure he is! Those were his plumbs, handed out for good fund raising in the election four years ago. AND HE GOT HIS TOP FUNDRAISER KILLED!

It was the ONLY time I have EVER seen Mr. Obama register that deep-seated, self-righteous anger that is born of a conviction. The conviction, however, is based on his lie- that he did "all he could" to insure their safety. No way he did.

Self-righteous anger is the worst kind to reason with. There is a basis in truth, but it is smeared with a big story to build it into a wall of lies. And here we are again...

The WH is involved in a controversy of lies. This is about a coverup. It has progressed now to a coverup of a coverup. The WH and POTUS are trying to tell us that they didn't tell us what they told us.

The state department turned him down when he asked for security. They ignored 9/11. They blamed a video and threw that man in jail!

But the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and the President of the United States, Barak Obama, went out and taped advertisements to run in foreign countries to apologize for a video that had NOTHING TO DO WITH LIBYA! Obama spoke to the United Nations and APOLOGIZED over and over again to the world about a video that had nothing to do with the attack!

They went out there to bolster up their lie. And we all know it. We saw it. You cannot tell a lie over and over and make it anything more than a lie. Especially when four people are dead!

Watergate, Whitewatergate and Benghazigate

The biggest difference in all these scandals here is that in Benghazi people were killed and their families want answers. So do the American people. "Dead" is a permanent condition.

It is only a matter of time before the videos from those terrorists start to surface. The Ambassador was dragged through the streets, tortured and sodomized by foreign objects. You and I know that there are videos of those savages performing that torture on this man. Its only a matter of time before those iPhone pics come out.

Results of the Debate?

All I can say is that the President may have won on points. He may have won because a tie is all he needed. But he opened the door to hell with Benghazi and Crowley, in her efforts to aid him, only gave leverage to the concerns of Americans across the country. He lied, people died. 

Next week, the debate is on foreign affairs. Whoooa! With his history with Netenyahu and Israel, and this scandal in Benghazi, I would not want to be him.

What I predict is that he will say he is winning the war on terrorism and act superior to Mitt because he knows so much more. It won't fly. He will say he killed OBL. So? Got out of Iraq. So? Drawdown in Afghanistan. So?

Can he say that America is more well-loved across the world because he is in office? No. He said that would happen, but he may be liked by other countries, but he is not respected by our enemies. I almost expect him to say, "Give me that flexibility and I will show you!" The flexibility he said he would have AFTER the election into a hot mike in Russia. . .

And this is where the rubber meets the road on Benghazi. We shall see.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Obama And Romney Lawyers Protest Debate Moderator Candy Crowley Expressed Intention To Violate Contract « Pat Dollard

Obama And Romney Lawyers Protest Debate Moderator Candy Crowley Expressed Intention To Violate Contract « Pat Dollard:

'via Blog this'

Candy Crowley believes that the debate is about her; I'd be willing to bet that she also thinks it is her job to rescue her candidate (President Obama) from himself. After all, the poor guy is going to be absent a TelePrompTer.

The President has demonstrated that he suffers from a fatal dose of ego; that is, hubris, the stuff of Greek tragedies. The mighty fall prey to themselves through hubris...
And the President has taken a few days off his campaigning to study debating - but if a man is not teachable, a man cannot be taught. To be teachable, one has to recognize that they do not themselves, have all the information.

THAT, my dear friends, is going to be a challenge for this guy.

Imagine being the Obama debate coaching team! What a f-g nightmare!

Everyone knows working with entitlement junkies is a disaster. I cannot think of anyone who seems to be more entitled except maybe, Lindsay Lohan.

Anyhow, I am keeping my eyes on the moderator. Looks like both these guys are afraid she is going to color out of the lines!

UPDATE: Crowley did rescue Obama. Lead-in on Libya and cutting off Romney; giving him more time; insulting Romney's intelligence